Policies
This is a privately owned and operated site. The owner maintains sole discretion as to what content is and is not allowed.
Commenting Policy
Comments are welcome from all, but there are some rules:
- Abusive, threatening, or overly profane comments are not allowed. Act like an adult.
- Do not reveal another person’s personal information. Violating this policy will get you banned immediately and may result in your private information being published.
- Stay on topic. Occasional deviations are expected and are not discouraged, but a pattern of hijacking threads may result in the offender being banned.
- Comments represent the opinion of the individual leaving the comment and not the owner of the site. If you believe that a comment is defamatory then contact the blog owner (brian-at-flashpointblog-dot-com) and the situation will be reviewed.
- Anonymous comments and pseudonyms are allowed, however repeated comments using multiple screen names will not be allowed. Pick a name (like the one you use in real life) and stick with it.
- Spam or comments left with the sole intent of advertising a product will be deleted.
- If you are affiliated with a campaign or have some other direct interest in the subject matter you are commenting on please state this up front.
- If you feel that a comment violates these policies please contact me.
- The site owner has the final say about what is and is not allowed.
Privacy Policy
Simple – I don’t reveal anyone’s private information without their permission. I will not sell or give your name, email address, or any other information to another entity. The sole exceptions are:
- Commenters who are overly hostile or who reveal the private information of others may have their own private information revealed for the purpose of warning other blog operators.
- Campaign operatives (and other individuals with a vested interest in the subject matter) who post comments without identifying their interests may be exposed. This could include individuals with a business interest denigrating competitors under the guise of a private citizen.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Any attempts to use content from this site in a for-profit endeavor without the express permission of the site owner are prohibited.
One Response
leave one →
According to an article in the May 30, 2009 Huntsville Times, about 20 entrepreneurs will become owner-operators of a new Food market in the Terry Heights area in 2010. (All editorializing is mine to strip out the paper’s biased reporting, and to put the issue in proper perspective)
This new private profit making business gives the owners a chance to build wealth and long-term equity from the profits they will share. Each employee owns a share in the enterprise, have one vote, and decide how the profits are distributed. It is unknown at this time whether the business will be licensed by the city, and if the private profit making business will pay taxes.
Could the Food Bank of North Alabama’s involvement in the private profit making business start-up possibly be illegal? A food bank is a non-profit organization that distributes millions of pounds of donated food and grocery products to human services agencies. Their 501 (c )(3) charter does not include starting up private profit making business. Because the Food Bank is partially funded by the taxpayers through FEMA and USDA, could there also be other conflicts of interest?
The new Food Market will be built by Huntsville Housing Development and leased to the worker-owners for an undetermined amount. It is unknown at this time if the Huntsville Housing Development, which appears to be involved with subsidized housing, is associated with the Huntsville Housing Authority, and the many taxpayers dollars of HUD that they posses.
HUD is also going to possibly pitch in $300,000 of taxpayer money to help buy freezers and startup equipment for the private profit making business owned by the employees. Could this also be illegal by its very nature?
Alabama Sustainable Agriculture Network, subsidized by the Department of Agriculture, a government agency operating 100% on taxpayer’s dollars, will also support the startup. Here again, is this a possible violation of federal regulations?
The city council approved $10 a year lease of 1.2 acres of City owned property for this private profit making business. It is unknown at this time what the land is actually worth and how much it is costing Huntsville taxpayers to help these 20 business owners get rich off the taxpayers in their new private profit making business. The new business is expected to generate nearly $1 million dollars during the first two years.
We need do something about this – it is so terribly wrong.
Member, Huntsville Community Rights
Member, South Huntsville Civic Association
Glenn S. Crawley