Ditto on the Iron Bowl bribery
Posted by Brian on December 1st, 2007Read Steve’s post to get a flavor of how I feel about the Tigers and Tide doling out free Iron Bowl (and other) tickets and parking passes to legislators and other government officials throughout the state.
I was half joking when the story first broke about auditing the tax returns of recipients of the tickets, but I’m thinking that may be just what the public needs to call for. I would bet a Tide-y amount of money that a large portion of the various politicians and bureaucrats didn’t list the tickets or parking passes as income, which they are since they have value. I also wonder how the federal and state income tax auditors would value the tickets since they can’t be purchased by us common folk without first contributing hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars to the school’s athletic fundraising group.
For the record, the chairman of the utterly useless Alabama Ethics Commission says the ticket give aways don’t violate ethics laws.
Ethics Commission Director Jim Sumner said under the law universities and other organizations may give away tickets to sporting and other entertainment events without penalty and without reporting it.
“As long as it’s not of continuous nature such as giving season passes, they’re at liberty to invite members of the State Legislature to these events,” he said.
Maybe Sumner and I have differing definitions of “continuous nature.” If the universities give all those tickets and parking passes away every year it seems quite continuous in nature to me. I wonder if Sumner gets tickets?
Sumner was quoted in the Birmingham News sounding a little more critical of the gifts.
The Ethics Commission says there’s nothing illegal about the free tickets. “I’m not saying it’s the right thing,” said Jim Sumner, the commission’s director and a former lobbyist for the University of Alabama. “But it’s the way it’s always been done.”
Seriously. Sumner justifies the bribes by saying that “it’s always been done” that way. He admits it’s not the “right thing,” which I presume means it’s the “wrong thing.” So Sumner is saying that doing the wrong thing is OK because that is how we’ve always done it. And he’s leading our ethics commission.



Recent Comments
Sorry, not explicit enough. O'Reilly was (I think) trying...
It's backhanded, all right. I'm just having trouble seeing w...
It would be interesting to see how the cities in Israel of s...
32/33. Missed the tax question Reactionary got right....
If I am not mistaken, Bill himself is from New York....