I had a hard time choosing who to vote for in the Huntsville mayoral race on Tuesday, Aug. 26. Loretta Spencer has been a fine mayor and will likely go down as one of Huntsville’s best. However, in the last few years her administration has made some mistakes and decisions that make me question whether she is the right person to lead our city for the next four years. Tommy Battle has experience as a city councilman and has been successful in the private sector. His campaign has been message oriented and he is eager to address some of the issues that have come about recently.
I’m voting for Tommy Battle.
As I said earlier, Spencer has served Huntsville admirably. She was instrumental in creating the Research Park - the 2nd largest in the country. Her tenure has been largely free of scandal. The list could go on, but this election isn’t a lifetime achievement award. We have to vote based on the best choice looking forward, not backward.
One of the biggest issues for me is the metro jail that the city is building. The original budget was $26 million, but overruns have pushed the total cost to nearly $70 million. It has been a complete disaster and a huge waste of taxpayer dollars. Is Loretta Spencer personally responsible for this? No, but it did happen on her watch. I look at it this way, though. Spencer once had freshly installed playground equipment removed in favor of more pleasing colored equipment. That is called micro management. The mayor of a city the size of Huntsville has bigger fish to fry than jungle gym colors. Why wasn’t Spencer micromanaging the jail project that spiraled out of control? She obviously had time to kill if she could bother herself with teeter totters.
More recently was the bungled relocation of a homeless shelter. I have my doubts that the final outcome would have been any different, but the city, including Spencer, did an abysmal job of making the move transparent. All involved had to know that the decision was going to be extremely controversial and making it seemed like a back room deal left a bad taste in everyones mouth. Again, was Spencer solely or primarily responsible? No. But she could have, should have, led the efforts to make the process more open.
There are other things that could be done better: roads, schools, etc. Some projects and decisions are outside the jurisdiction of the mayor, but the mayor has a very formidable bully pulpit to help shape the actions of others.
I’ve had a number of opportunites to talk with Tommy Battle during this campaign. I’ve found him to be knowledgable, eager, and ready. He will get my vote.
Can he win, though? I think so, but more importantly some influential individuals think he has a strong chance. Both the Committee of 100 and the local teachers union split their endorsements between the two candidates. You don’t see movers and shakers hedging their bets like that unless they think the race is too close to call.
Recent Comments
Sarah Palin hasn't practiced abstinence? This isn't China -...
Maybe they should consider ...
I commented on how refreshing this was as well. The politic...
very good article, thanks for the recommend!...
Countrycat, yes we have been involved diplomatically with So...