Shelby gains my respect, Bush does not
Posted by BrianI loathe Sen. Richard Shelby’s pork barrelling ways, but I applaud him for having the courage to stand in the way of the $700 billion taxpayer fleecing. We’ll see how long and fervently he holds his ground.
The proposed bailout is not the solution we should pursue. George Bush, who I’ve long contended is no conservative, is reverting to unabashed socialism to solve a problem. It is shameful.
I’ll throw something out there and see how it sticks.
Bush’s decision to socialize the loses of financial institutions was one of fear. Fear that can be wrapped in one word: 401k. (Is that even a word?)
For far too long the government has altruistically manipulated the populace of this country. One of the most notable relative to the current situation was creating tax exempt status for investing in mutual funds through 401k’s and similar programs. Really it was a fantastic coup by Wall Street since their “product” is little more than legalized gambling. Somehow they convinced the ruling class to guarantee them a huge customer base. The people reacted accordingly to tax incentives and now there is about $2.4 trillion “invested” in 401k plans.
Bush is hearing, from Wall Street, about the possibility of the credit markets seizing up and a subsequent huge drop in equity values. That would wipe out a huge swath of paper wealth held by regular folks. Pretty scary stuff. But the only reason so much money is held in such plans is because of the well intentioned governmental social engineering. The similarly altruistic push to increase home ownership - even if it necessitated reduced lending standards - is causing similar negative consequences. And now Bush, the so-called conservative, is so fearful of the consequences of what decades of government social engineering hath wrought that he is willing to essentially nationalize the financial sector to stave off losses. The answer is not more government intrusion, but less.
The companies that are struggling need to be allowed to fail. That is the nature and the beauty of capitalism. The weak will fail and the strong will not only survive, but will learn from the mistakes of others. Negative consequences are essential to preventing undesired behavior. The pain will be acute among many, no doubt, and may be felt somewhat by all. But the solution he is proposing will not only tear asunder the principled underpinnings of our economy, but it will spread the misery among us all through inflationary pressures. The nasty side of that is that those of us who don’t have golden parachute deals or weekend homes on Cape Cod will feel that pain the most acutely. This isn’t meant to sound populist; I admire those who work hard enough or are valued enough to succeed (from a materialistic view). But they were those who engaged in risky or too-complex financial transactions should be the ones who reap what they have sown. That goes for regular homeowners and Wall Street tycoons alike.
No bailouts with taxpayer money.
I don’t even want to hear another self proclaimed conservative praise Bush. I’m sick of it. If you want to praise him as a party loyalist, fine. Just don’t call him a conservative while you’re doing it.
I’m going to breathe now.
Reactionary Update:
It’s the new Bush Doctrine: Preemptive Bailout.
Related content:
September 26th, 2008 at 7:48 am
Brian, couldn’t agree more.
Even with all the pork Shelby has won, that is just a flash in the pan compared to this $700 billion boondoggle. He is standing strong against a heap of pressure from the ruling elite.
Here is a good article I found this morning on Sen. Shelby:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/25/AR2008092504308.html?sub=AR
September 26th, 2008 at 7:42 pm
The problem will be weaning people off the notion government is here to kiss their booboos and tie their shoes. Unfortunately, none of the presidential contenders see this as their job.
September 26th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
Man I miss the days when I thought this guy might maybe, just maybe in 1000 years, be elected President.
September 27th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
Shelby has shown true leadership and character during this financial crisis. It is nice to know that we have somebody representing us who will hold their feet to the fire!
September 28th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
I ‘ll wait and see on Shelby.
September 29th, 2008 at 6:15 pm
Guess, we’ll soon know if we made the bed lumpy or not. According to the news, the House has killed the bail out amidst the usual finger pointing. preening and statesman like behavior.
September 30th, 2008 at 6:34 pm
What? You think 401Ks are responsible for this mess? That’s one I haven’t heard.
I think 401Ks are a good thing. It lets people manage their own retirement accounts and postpone paying taxes until they are most likely in a lower bracket. And you don’t have to invest in risky stocks; you can just put it in CDs, money markets or government bonds.
September 30th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
No, Carson. I’m saying that 401k’s play a role in the disproportionate response, not the problem. They play a role in the reckless, hasty surge towards a socialist solution to a perceived problem.
September 30th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
Carson, 401ks are managed by the company. I think they’re great, too, but you can only invest in what the fund managers say you can invest in.
October 1st, 2008 at 7:47 am
@Brian: Yes, I’ve heard politicians using the potential loss of retirement savings as justification for government action, but politicians will always find some populist rationale for their actions.
@Dan: Well I guess it depends on the company. Most companies provide a selection of investments with varying degrees of risk and then leave it up to the individual to decide where to put his or her money. That’s what my company did. If your company gives you no say in your 401K investments you might want to petition them for more flexibility.
October 1st, 2008 at 11:49 am
I actually have a pretty good deal of flexibility and variety, but I believe it’s all funds (which is fine by me). So I can’t directly invest in stocks, CDs, etc.
October 1st, 2008 at 7:29 pm
Brian,
Excellent article. You probably saw this comment from President Bush yesterday:
“It matters little what path a bill takes to become law. What matters is that we get a law. We’re at a critical moment in our economy.”
Uh, isn’t the way we make law in America what makes us uniquely American? I mean, that checks and balances thing. Isn’t that important?
October 6th, 2008 at 11:44 am
City runoff election tomorrow - thoughts?
November 13th, 2008 at 7:35 am
[...] enterprise. Notify authorities. The impostor is again railing against a federal bailout (he also stood up against the $700 billion): “The financial situation facing the Big Three is not a national problem, but their [...]