Tell me something I didn’t know
Posted by BrianGeorge Bush is a bigger spender than LBJ.
When adjusted for inflation, discretionary spending — or budget items that Congress and the president can control, including defense and domestic programs, but not entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare — shot up at an average annual rate of 5.3 percent during Bush’s first six years, Slivinski calculates.
That tops the 4.6 percent annual rate Johnson logged during his 1963-69 presidency. By these standards, Ronald Reagan was a tightwad; discretionary spending grew by only 1.9 percent a year on his watch.
Without including entitlements Bush is worse than LBJ. Yikes. But Bush made that problem worse as well.
Then there was the 2003 Medicare prescription drug benefit — the biggest single expansion in the program’s history — whose 10-year costs are estimated at more than $700 billion.
I know that most Republicans still pledge loyalty to W, but face it - the man is not a conservative. Blame Congress for reckless spending all you want, but Bush was the enabler who could have put the kibosh on it at any time. But he wasn’t merely complicit, he was an active part of the problem.
Related content:
October 25th, 2007 at 3:59 pm
Do most Republicans still pledge loyalty to Bush? I mean, outside of Alabama? (Saw an SUV yesterday with an “S: The Coach” sticker on the left and a “W: The President” sticker on the right.)
September 25th, 2008 at 10:58 pm
[...] bailout is not the solution we should pursue. George Bush, who I’ve long contended is no conservative, is reverting to unabashed socialism to solve a problem. It is [...]