From the Washington Times:

More and more colleges are actively recruiting home-schooled students, each year there are an estimated 50,000-plus home-school high school graduates who find work or go to college and thousands of new curriculum products have become available over the past five years. Meanwhile, the number of home-schoolers continues to grow by 7 percent to 15 percent each year, more states are reforming their laws to remove the burdens from parents who want to home educate, and home-schoolers continue to excel in national competitions as well as on standardized tests. In short, home-schooling is a major success story.

While the Home School Legal Defense Association agrees with the ruling in this specific case, it is a reminder to all families that when your child enters the public school, you have virtually ceded your parental rights to the public school.

The clearest explanation of this view was expressed by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Fields v. Palmdale, when it said, “While parents may have a fundamental right to decide whether to send their child to a public school, they do not have a fundamental right generally to direct how a public school teaches their child.”

This is the reason many parents have chosen to home-school, especially those parents who have a religious worldview, because they know their children will be taught secular values by the public system.

In Morse v. Frederick, however, Justice Clarence Thomas said, “If parents do not like the rules imposed by those schools, they can seek redress in school boards or legislatures; they can send their children to private schools or home school them; or they can simply move.”

My personal philosophy is that parents should be solely responsible for instilling religious and moral values in their children.  That is why I oppose prayer in schools and religious classes in mandatory attendance government schools.  The government is doing a poor job teaching our kids things like math and science, why would I expect them to be able to teach them religion any better?  Plus, what if the brand of religion they choose to teach - and remember according to the 9th circuit you have no right to direct how they instruct - doesn’t agree with you philosophy?  Do it at home.

Personally, I think the biggest impetus to home school is to enable gifted children to receive an outstanding education.  I like to call our federal government’s No Child Left Behind program No Child Gets Ahead.  The government is trying to homogenize the education of all students.  They are trying to get each kid to the same education level, so if your kid is smart they won’t invest their efforts to advance her farther because they have to use their scarce educational resources to bring the laggards up to speed.  If you educate you children at home then you can craft a curriculum that pushes them to their fullest extent.

Obviously home schooling isn’t for everyone.  It requires time as well as innate and learned skills.  We’re probably not going to home school, but we’ve talked about it and I think we would be well prepared if we chose to.  I’m an engineer skilled in math and science.  My wife, who stays home these days, is a degreed history teacher.  We may begin to consider it more seriously as our children get to the age where we have to choose between sending them to a government school or private school.  If private school is not in the budget then I imagine we’ll give home schooling some serious thought.

Related content: