The Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama (PARCA) recently conducted a survey of over 400 Alabamians on a number of ethics related topics.  The results (link here) show a healthy skepticism at the openness and honesty of our government.  Large percentages favored ending PAC-to-PAC transfers, reporting all lobbyist spending, and banning legislators for holding other state jobs.

Selected questions/responses:

  1. What is the best method for selecting judges?
    • 42% : Nonpartisan elections
    • 30% : Partisan elections
    • 21% : Appointment, retention
    • 7% : No Opinion
  2. Should lobbyists report all spending on legislators?
    • 90% : Required to report all spending
    • 8% : Okay to spend without reporting
    • 2% : No opinion
  3. How much should lobbyists be allowed to spend on legislators?
    • 39% : Eliminate spending altogether
    • 29% : $250 about right/too little
    • 28% : $250 too high
    • 4% : No opinion
  4. Should PAC-to-PAC transfers be allowed?
    • 83% : No
    • 9% : Yes
    • 8% : No opinion
  5. Should Alabama legislators be allowed to hold other state jobs?
    • 60% : Prohibited from state jobs
    • 35% : Allowed to hold state jobs
    • 5% : No opinion

The biggest surprise for me is that 29% of respondents thought the $250 per day (unreported) lobbying limit was “about right/too little.”  Did the conductor of the survey happen to call a bunch of lobbyists and legislators?

The other somewhat surprising, but encouraging, response was to the method for judicial selections.  I did not expect more people to support nonpartisan elections than partisan ones.  I would have assumed that far too many people need the intellectual crutch of a political party for making their selections.

Related content: