Assigning value to political speech
Posted by BrianI’ve heard the conservative pundits on the radio talk about the “Fairness Doctrine,” but until I read this I didn’t know how harmful it would really be.
When [Washington] state’s government imposed a 9.5-cents-per-gallon increase in the gas tax, John Carlson and Kirby Wilbur of station KVI began advocating repeal by initiative. Proponents of repeal put up a Web site, hoping to raise 1,000 volunteers and $25,000. In two days they had 6,500 and $87,000. Needing 224,880 signatures to put repeal on the ballot, they got 400,996.
Appalled by this outburst of grass-roots democracy, some local governments, which stood to gain many millions from the tax, unleashed a law firm that would gain substantially from handling the bond issues the tax would finance. The firm set out to muzzle Carlson and Wilbur, using the state’s campaign regulations.
It got a judge to rule that the broadcasters were not just supporters of the repeal campaign, they were agents of it. Why, they had even used the pronoun “we” when referring to proponents of repeal. Their speech constituted political advertising, and their employer was making an “in-kind contribution” to the repeal campaign. The judge said a monetary value must be placed on their speech (he did not say how, he just said to do it that day). The law says reports must be filed and speech limits obeyed or fines imposed.
There’s more. Read for yourself.
Related content:
Recent Comments
You should read ...
We need to work on our posting cycles. When I post less yo...
Don't worry, they will not let you miss them for very long.Â...
The worst airline ever! They will leave you standing at t...
Jefferson County committed to contribute $10 million per yea...